Be Warned: The "Apostle" Kathryn Krick

For a PDF of this blog post entitled “Be Warned: The ‘Apostle’ Kathryn Krick” click here.

The spirit of the age is alive and well as the emptiness of the prosperity gospel movement and the name-it-claim-it hucksters continue to sow the destructive seeds of false promises, half-truths, and lamentable ministry practices while being elevated through new social media channels.

Meet “The Apostle of TikTok” – Kathryn Krick.

Over twenty years ago, John Piper’s off-the-cuff critique of the prosperity gospel is still his most viewed sermon clip of all time. “I don’t know what you feel about the prosperity gospel—the health, wealth and prosperity gospel—but I’ll tell you what I feel about it. Hatred.” (See The Story Behind John Piper’s Most Famous Attack on the Prosperity Gospel”.)

Righteous anger against a movement that has deceived millions worldwide is indeed a proper gospel response to the destructive practices of the prosperity gospel with its the name-it-claim-it preachers.

The latest poster-girl of this phenomenon is the failed LA actress turned preacher and author, Kathryn Krick, whose viral videos of people convulsing on the ground at her book signings and her famous anointing from the Tanzanian prophet GeorDavie are now giving Kathryn Krick her “viral moment”. With a following of nearly 600,000 on Instagram and nearly 300,000 on TikTok (alongside 3.5 million likes), it is only a matter of time until you come across another viral moment from her ministry.

Allie Beth Stuckey recently released a video entitled “Apostle Kathryn Krick: The Truth about Her Viral Exorcisms” (Episode 1374) Stuckey offers a biblical assessment of several ministry practices associated with Kathryn Krick’s ministry. In short, many within the Christian community have raised serious biblical, theological, and ministerial concerns about the so-called “Apostle of TikTok”.

Pictured: Allie Beth Stuckey’s Relatable Podcast - “Apostle Kathryn Krick: The Truth about her Viral Exorcisms” (Episode 1374).

First Red (🚩): False ministry practices.

If you watch near the end of the Allie Beth Stuckey video referenced above (1:01:00), you will see a child (8-10 years old), convulsing on the ground, with Krick talking to the mom.

Krick explains to the mom that the key is to sow [financial] seeds for the boy to be healed and delivered. The mom replies that she has already been tithing 10% for the last two years. Krick tells her that she must go above and beyond the 10% for the demon to release her son.

I’m urging you to ask: where is the precedent for this in the Bible? 

In a word, this is vulgar. This is not from God.

2 Peter 2:1-3: “But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed3 And in their greed they will exploit you with false words. Their condemnation from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep.”

We are never urged to pay money in order to leverage God to do our bidding. This is pure manipulation for financial gain.

Benny Hinn does it. Kenneth Copeland does it. Faith healers do it. But there is no biblical precedent. Did the apostle Paul do it? Did the apostle Peter do it? Did Jesus ask people to sow financially into his ministry before he healed and delivered them? Did Jesus ask Blind Bartimaeus to sow a financial gift into his ministry before healing him (Mark 10:46-52)?

Faith healers skew the sowing and reaping verses (Galatians 6:7-9; Proverbs 22:8; Job 4:8; Hosea 10:12) by turning a spiritual law of character into a financial transaction. In the context of Galatians 6, the seed refers to moral choices, spiritual character, and doing good deeds rather than sowing money in order to leverage God to work on your behalf. Even in 2 Cor. 9:6,10, the historical context is about Paul collecting an offering for the relief of the poor in Jerusalem, so he’s asking the church to be generous – based on their Christian character and God’s heart for the poor. The apostle Paul never urges believers to sow financial seeds with a view towards securing healing or deliverance from an apostolic messenger.

In fact, when Simon the Sorcerer in Acts 8 sought to buy the gift of the Holy Spirit’s power with money, Peter answered him with a harsh rebuke. 

Peter answered, “May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money! 21 You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. 22 Repent of this wickedness and pray to the Lord in the hope that he may forgive you for having such a thought in your heart. 23 For I see that you are full of bitterness and captive to sin.” (Acts 8:20-23).

Second Red (🚩): Power Trippin’.

So much unhealthy hero worship surrounds the ministry of Kathryn Krick that it’s a huge red flag: it not only lacks biblical warrant and precedent but also smells of narcissism and a power trip.

People bowing with their heads to the ground before Kathry Krick? This is cultish. Allowing grown men and women to call her “Mama”?

This is more than “showing honor”; this is an improper elevation of a person within the church of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is the Head of the Church and only he should receive honor, power, and glory! 

In Acts 14:8-18, in the city of Lystra, a crowd tries to over-do the honor shown to Paul and Barnabas by offering sacrifices to them because of a miracle of healing a man crippled from birth. Paul and Barnabas tear their clothes, run into the crowd, and urge the crowd to only offer honor and praise to the Living God. The apostle Paul would never have allowed the kind of cult-like loyalty and following that Kathryn Krick seemingly expects of her followers.

Paul and Barnabas cry out that day: “Men, why are you doing these things? We also are men, of like nature with you, and we bring you good news, that you should turn from these vain things to a living God, who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and all that is in them.” (Acts 14:15)

Third Red (🚩): Connection with False Prophet GeorDavie.

The company Krick keeps speaks volumes about her ministry, as Proverbs 13:20 reminds us: “Whoever walks with the wise becomes wise, but the companion of fools will suffer harm.”

Krick is suffering the companion of fools, as her “Spiritual Father” and “Daddy” is the Tanzanian self-proclaimed prophet GeorDavie whose ministry antics expose him as nothing less than a ravenous wolf in sheep’s clothing (Matthew 7:15). His antics include arriving at poor African villages in a helicopter (with a red carpet laid out on the ground to escort him to his luxurious SUV) and wearing a kingly crown and a robe during ministry events (like a Jesus figure or perhaps an African head of state).

GeorDavie is making himself wealthy by fraudulently offering name-it-claim-it promises to the African poor, flaunting an ostentatious display of wealth that is sickening and disgusting. Currently, the self-stylized prophet is facing intense public scrutiny over allegations of sexual and spiritual abuse; multiple women have brought forth sordid text and audio recordings – the receipts – which support the accusations that he has used his ministry to prey upon women.

This is the man Krick continues to honor and admire?

Guru magazine originally broke the story with the headline L.A.’s Viral Exorcist Kathryn Krick Knew of Prophet’s Sexual Abuse Allegations: How an aspiring actress fell under the sway of an obscure Tanzanian prophet – and built a viral ministry in his image,” by Be Scofield, August 6, 2026.

See also Allie Beth Stuckey, “‘He’s a Warlock’: Kathryn Krick’s Spiritual Father’s Dark Secrets,” Episode 1385 on the Relatable podcast.  

See also Fighting for the Faith Podcast, “Kathryn Krick responds and goes full Jim Jones.”

 See Jude 3-4: “Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.”.

 See 2 Peter 2:2: “But false prophets also arose among the people…and many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed.”

Fourth Red (🚩): Unequipped to Teach.

I watched a sermon review “Preaching from the Book of Kathryn Krick” by “The Honest Youth Pastor” on YouTube.

The first problem is that Kathryn Krick is basically preaching from her own book. Not scripture. This is a red flag for her entire teaching ministry.

The second problem is that she begins the sermon by reading Ephesians chapter 2. So far, so good. The question is: does she explain the passage, interpret the passage, or in any way exegete the main Pauline thrust of the passage? The answer is “not even close”.

She treats the Ephesians 2 scripture like an MLB ballpark treats the National Anthem before the game. The scripture kicks off the sermon but is really never heard from again. Kind of like the National Anthem at a Baseball Park.

People who follow Krick will undoubtedly hear – and eventually come to believe – many erroneous biblical teachings the longer they stay within earshot and in the shadow of her ministry.

  • In one interview, Krick baldly says that “Jesus is a spirit” when, in fact, Jesus is now seated at the right hand of the Father in a glorified body. “See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself. Touch me, and see. For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.” (Luke 24:39). [See “The Way with Brian Davila and Apostle Kathryn Krick” near minute 25-26.] The lack of a robust and careful biblical theology in her teaching ministry shows up time and time again.

  •  When Kathryn receives her apostleship, she lauds her mentor, GeorDavie, with these words: “They [the world] will not know the real Jesus unless they know you.” [“Apostle Kathryn Krick: The Truth about Her Viral Exorcisms” (Episode 1374); minute 19:45]  What? Again, this is hero worship with a cult-like tendency.

    Years later – I’m guessing through her PR team – Krick disavowed those cringy words. Yet, it is still enlightening to note that her very first words as a (supposed grandiose) “apostle” are a statement of heresy and false teaching. How unlike the apostle Paul and the early church!

Fifth Red (🚩): Ardent Drive for Power and Fame instead of Gospel Humility.

During my time in Central Africa, I met many self-proclaimed modern “apostles.” My conclusion is this: I have never met a single one who was humble. This is a gospel concern, because the grace of God and the gospel of Jesus Christ should produce humility in our lives (Phil 2:3-8; Gal 6:14; Eph 2:8-9). Yet humility is difficult to find in the ministries of Krick and GeorDavie; instead, a lust for power and fame appears to be the dominant driving force.

Sixth Red (🚩): A False Annointing.

One word pervades every aspect Krick’s ministry – “anointing”. She is the “anointed” apostle dispensing powerful “appointing” prayers through the “anointing” of the Holy Spirit in a way that is unique and singular because she is part of the vanguard in bringing the “anointing” of revival to the world.

It’s all very silly (at best) and a false doctrine (at worst). It’s the classic case of a biblical word being stretched, twisted, and abused waaaaaay out of proportion to its actual usage and occurrence in the Bible. Simply put, this is how false teaching has developed in the entire history of the church. To preach a biblical motif out of proportion to the Bible is unbiblical preaching.

Krick has uprooted a biblical word from its original context and expounded its meaning ad nauseum out of proportion to the rest of the Bible until the word has become unrecognizable.

In the New Testament, Jesus was anointed before his death on the cross (Mark 14:3-9), because he was fulfilling the roles of prophet-priest-king from the Old Testament. Yet, the New Testament never commands us to “seek the anointing” or “seek out the super-apostle with the anointing”. Jesus alone is the Messiah, which means “the anointed one”.

Krick’s fascination with the power of “anointing” is like the old gnostic heresy in the sense that some super-Christians evidently have been blessed with this “secret knowledge” and “special power” called “the anointing” to free people from demons. Paul called those people (tongue-in-check) the Super-Apostles and warned the churches about them (2 Cor. 11-12).

Seventh Red (🚩): Krick’s deliverance ministry is not only highly sensationalized and needlessly theatrical but also bona fide untruthful and spiritually abusive.

Justin Peters highlights a “healing” wherein a 9-10 year old girl with cerebral palsy is coached out of a wheelchair by Krick with adults holding her up beneath her armpits as she walks supported across the stage. Krick pronounces “Jesus has healed you today” and “you will walk” with the caveat “little by little” (spoiler alert: she is not healed).

What’s more? Krick’s ministry photoshops out the two adults supporting the weight of this little girl as she walks across the stage in the thumbnail entitled “Little Girl Delivered & Gets out of the Wheelchair” (Didache – Kathryn Krick Preys Upon Crippled Kids and I’ve Had Enough, minute 37).

Hoax. Lie.

Krick is exploiting this young girl in her own lust for power and fame.

The young girl gives a “testimony” as she walks supported across the stage: “I always loved your videos and I always was like I hope there’s nothing [demons] inside of me.”

Think of the spiritual abuse this little girl is experiencing: she is pronounced “healed” by a fraudulent apostle which may produce spiritual trauma and doubt in God down the road in her life (i.e. “Why would God let a ministry leader pronounce me ‘healed’ when I was not?”)  This little girl has now swallowed the false theology, through Krick’s ministry, that her cerebral palsy is due to having demons “inside of me.” This is spiritual harm to a child.

In the hands of Krick, the world is essentially divided into two groups: people with “the anointing” (like Krick) and the rest of the world which suffers from demons. Living in a fallen, broken world is downplayed, and the three great enemies of the Christian life – the world, the flesh, and the devil – are all collapsed down into demons which need the super-apostle’s “anointing” for you to live your best life now.

It’s a false theology which leads to damaging ministry practices which leads to a disturbing amount of spiritual abuse.

Eighth Red (🚩): Lacks a Biblical “Theology of Suffering”.

The prosperity gospel in general and Krick’s ministry in particular never sufficiently develop a “theology of suffering”. Does Krick ever preach from a Psalm of Lament? Does Krick ever preach from Job 1-2 when God puts Job to the test through suffering?

The praxis of the prosperity gospel is that faith is subverted. Faith is used as a weapon against God to secure blessings, healings, and the abundant life. God is treated as a “means to an end”.

Yet, God is the end! God is good even in the midst of our suffering. God is beautiful even in the midst of our laments. God is lovely even in the midst of our sin and brokenness (Romans 7). In the end, the prosperity gospel never develops sufficiently a “theology of suffering” – it has no room for it because, after all, we are all “Kingdom Kids” who have a “Rich Father” who longs to bless our socks off!

If the prosperity gospel’s emphasis lies (primarily) in financial well-being, then the “name it-claim it” false gospel highlights (primarily) healing and deliverance.

Krick drives her ministry car (mostly) in the second lane, yet the two false doctrines notoriously travel together. They are always kissing cousins. Modern-day “apostles” have different shticks, but they almost always minister in the same circles and enthusiastically support each other’s networks.

Like nailing JELLO to a wall, the prosperity gospel is notoriously difficult to pin down. Discerning truth from error can feel like playing the game: “Two Truths and a Lie.” A clever person can convince you that their lie is the truth because the lie is being concealed and hidden subversively around carefully orchestrated sound bites – biblical words are being cleverly utilized.

But that’s all that’s going on. Using biblical words is not the same as preaching biblical doctrine.

Prosperity gospel preachers will talk about Jesus, but half-truths and outright lies always lurk below the surface of their biblical interpretation and ministerial practices. The prosperity gospel lays a distinctively erroneous framework and grid over the whole Bible. It provides an overarching hermeneutic to interpreting the entire Bible which leads away from the sufficiency of Christ and the glory of God.

The prosperity gospel highlights “biblical phrases” – sometimes rather periphery to orthodox biblical teachings – but, in the hands of prosperity gospel preachers, they become popular catchphrases and watchwords in the movement which are pounded into service for extravagant “health and wealth” promises. The prosperity gospel makes faith’s de facto object something other than Christ – such as “the abundant life”, “the victorious life”, or “the blessed life”.

The prosperity gospel takes biblical verses and themes wildly out of context.

In sum, the emptiness of the prosperity gospel lies adjacent to the name-it-claim-it practices, and both false gospels downplay the role of suffering in the life of faith. Yet here’s the good news: if you can learn to discern the errors in the prosperity gospel, you will also begin to see the false doctrines and practices in the “name-it-claim it” movement.

Ninth Red (🚩): We have seen the trajectory of this ministry before.

Kathryn Krick is not doing anything new; as Ecclesiastes 1:9 states, “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.” Kathryn is just the latest leader to leverage the ubiquitous presence of the internet (Hello Tik Tok!) to capture likes and follows. What is the consensus regarding folks like Benny Hinn, Kenneth Copeland, and Paula White? They are false teachers. Kathryn Krick is taking the same page, with the same tactics, from the same playbook and parroting it. It’s all the same.

Warnings about false teachers abound in the New Testament including 2 Corinthians 11:13-15: “For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.  So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.” See also Matthew 7:15; Deuteronomy 18:20-22; Galatians 1:6-9; 1 John 4:1; 2 Peter 2:1-3.

So many people, over the years, have been so hurt and so wounded from the likes of Benny Hinn and Kenneth Copeland.

So many of their followers, over time, have recognized that Christian wisdom would have been to separate decisively from these kind of leaders.

For over 50 years, Binny Hinn and Kenneth Copeland have lauded miraculous healings that have occurred in their ministries, relying exclusively on anecdotal testimonies given on stage. Yet neither ministry has ever produced a single verifiable healing miracle subject to independent verification.

Think about it. Krick has been touting amazing healings for years through her “powerful anointing” as she spreads a so-called worldwide revival. Can she produce a single case of a medically-verifiable healing? As her ministry comes under intense scrutiny, now would be the perfect time to produce the receipts – the charts of a healed broken leg, a blind woman that sees, a cancer that miraculously disappeared.

Tim Challies writes instructively about Benny Hinn: “Hinn claims that God is working powerfully through him to heal others and begins to list those miracles, usually starting with ones that are invisible and unverifiable at the moment –diabetes, depression, and the like.” Back pain? A momentary migraine headache? Krick, Hinn, and Copeland are your anointed healers!

Krick is downstream from Copeland and Hinn, a false and fraudulent preacher preying on the hopes of her followers.

There is nothing new under the sun.

Tenth Red (🚩): Krick will circle the wagons in a cult-like way by demonizing her opponents as being Pharisees, haters, and not believing in the power of the Holy Spirit.

Over the coming months, Krick will garner more and more notoriety. As she receives more and more criticism, here is the playbook she will inevitably roll out to deal with the legitimate biblical criticism of her teaching and deliverance ministry:

  1. Don’t believe all the haters. They are blind to the power of God. So many churches and so many Christians don’t have the anointing and neither do they walk in the power of the Holy Spirit.” She will not address legitimate concerns. She will not repudiate doctrinal errors. She will not apologize for being greedy for gain in mixing miracles and money. She will not respond in humility but rather accuse people of being “Pharisees”, “haters”, “opposed to revival”, and “not open to the Holy Spirit”. This is always the playbook of false teachers.

  2. Krick will disparage local churches as “not having the anointing and power of the Holy Spirit” while arguing that the average Christian lives under the power and influence of demons. This effectively turns faithful Christians in local churches into sycophants loyal only to her. This is a page straight out of a cult-leader’s playbook upon receiving criticism: (i) gather a crowd that registers unquestioned loyalty to the leader and then (ii) tell that crowd they can’t really trust their former influences, mentors, or friends because only “this ministry/this leader” really has the keys to unlock the secrets of the kingdom of God for you.

In sum, beware of the false “apostle” Kathryn Krick.

*****

If you want to watch only one video exposing Krick, I’d recommend “Apostle Kathryn Krick: The Truth about Her Viral Exorcisms” (Episode 1374)

If you want to read more widely about the prosperity gospel in general or the biblical practice of spiritual warfare in particular, I’d recommend these books:

  • Read Health, Wealth and Happiness: Has the Prosperity Gospel Overshadowed the Gospel of Christ by David Jones and Russell Woodbridge.

  • Read God, Greed, and the (Prosperity) by Costi W. Hinn which is his personal and theological account detailing his exit from the ministry of his uncle Binny Hinn. Or, listen to a podcast of Costi Hinn who details the lavish lifestyle of Benny Hinn’s ministry including stays at $25,000/night hotels (i.e. The Royal Suite at the ultra-luxury Burj Al Arab Hotel in Dubai). From an insider’s perspective, Costi exposes the hucksters and charlatans of that ministry as full of fake healings and fraudulent testimonies of deliverance.

  • Read Power Encounters: Reclaiming Spiritual Warfare by David Powlison. This out-of-print book is being offered as a custom-reprint and is a great biblical exposition of the biblical practice of deliverance of demons by Jesus in the gospels and the apostles in the book of Acts.

Jason Carter
Is America in Revival?

In our own congregation over the last 16 months, Trinity has experienced several signs of healthy growth:

  • Attendance at our modern worship service (9:00 am) has experienced a 44% increase over the last 16 months [comparing the four-month period, Oct 2025 – Jan 2026, with the same time span 12 months ago, Oct. 2024 – Jan 2025].

  • When we factor in the attendance at our classic service (11:00), our church has experienced a 29% overall increase in total worshipping attendance from Oct. 2025 to Jan. 2026 compared to the same timeframe 12-16 months ago.

Moreover, I sense that God is at work more than simply in our rise in attendance.  After all, not all church attendance is created equal: not all surges in church attendance in America is “healthy” nor can it be linked simplistically or automatically with “spiritual vibrancy”. Equally important is the health of the body of Christ and the fruit of its members, and in this, also, I am greatly encouraged.

Simply put, our church is seeing:

  • Pockets of genuine repentance and life change in our midst.

  • Enthusiastic participation in prayer services (about 1/3 of our worshipping congregation recently attended one of the three times of prayer in early January). For American churches, the prayer service often represents “the most boring” type of service. I firmly believe that the body of Christ at Trinity is growing in prayer. Hallelujah!

  • Increased hunger for community and Life Groups with people increasingly warming to the idea of being spiritually formed by the simple rhythms of grace – worship, prayer, scripture, relationship – all focused on Jesus.

  • Greater enthusiasm for relational outreach in inviting people to participate in the community of faith.

  • New believers and people coming back to the Christian faith after a season of dormancy in wanting to get plugged into the life of faith, read scripture together, inquire of baptisms, and generally become re-engaged with Jesus.

The question is – is Trinity part of a national trend or are we experiencing something more localized? Simply put: Is America in Revival?

I, for one, would love to be leading a church where the cultural zeitgeist of the era seemingly paves the way for a massive and authentic influx of people into the church. This would be fruit-picking time for church leaders! I have a friend in Ethiopia who is training and equipping young Ethiopian leaders 22-25 years old to pastor churches of 2,000 to 5,000 people all around the country as the culture has decidedly tilted towards Christianity. The same phenomenon has amazingly occurred in various sub-Saharan African regions over the last 40 years. If this were to happen in America, it would mark the realization of many prayers and hopes for the American church, a kind of Third Great Awakening since the First Great Awakening (1730s-1740s) happened before the signing of the Declaration of Independence while the Second Great Awakening (1790s-1840s) occurred before the Civil War.  

Recently, I’ve encountered at least three national voices that have been encouraging church leaders to “pump the brakes” with the Revival Talk. Why is that the case?

First, the level of Christian identity has been steadily declining over the last 25 years, from 83% to 71%, according to David Kinnaman of the Barna Group. (You can listen to Kinnaman’s interview podcast with Carey Nieuwhof here.) Kinnaman and Nieuwhof cautioned church leaders on the recent national headlines about the possibility of revival amongst Gen Z, beginning with the Asbury Revival of Feb. 2023, due to the overall framework of institutional church decline.

The framework consists of this: (1) people who identity as Christians are decreasing (83% to 71% over last 25 years, (2) the average size church in America is decreasing (the median church size which was 137 people in 2000 has dropped to 60-65 people today, which means that over the last 25 years, the average church size in America has been more than cut in half), and (3) overall church membership is decreasing as well as the number of times/month that people typically attend a church even if they are a member.

Working with another set of data, the Religious Landscape Study (RLS), indicated a 15% decline of US adults who identity as Christian from 78% (in 2007) to 63% (in 2024) though there has been a stabilization of the decline over the last 5 years. To put this decline in perspective, 15% of the US population (of 330-340 million) equates to nearly 49.5 to 52 million people who no longer identity as Christian. This decline represents a massive down-turn of Christian identity in America over the last two decades!

Second, Ryan Burge’s article entitled “Perspective: What the data really says about religious revival and Gen Z: the reversal of a trend would require a transformation unlike anything we’ve seen in modern times” also serves to pump the brakes on the hopeful optimism for revival in America. Burge argues that the narrative of a massive return to church is not born out by actual statistics:

“It seems that a large segment of the American public is eager for any sign that the rise of the nones is over and that churches might begin to fill back up in the years to come…. As the share of adults with no religious affiliation climbed from just 6% in 1991 to nearly 30% in 2020, it would certainly make headlines if that march toward secularism suddenly stopped — and even more so if the ones leading a return to church were teens and 20-somethings.”

Burge argues that anecdotal narratives have often replaced actual statistics amongst mainstream media outlets.

Burge makes much of the idea of “generational replacement”, arguing that “every day, older Americans die and are replaced by young adults turning 18. This process unfolds slowly — almost imperceptibly — in the short term, but over five or 10 years, it can produce profound shifts in the overall landscape.” Burge is making a case which is pretty easy to understand: older adult Christians are dying and are not being replaced in the church at the same rate as those entering adulthood at age 18.

When you compare generations, the pattern is obvious. The youngest members of the Silent Generation were born in the early 1940s, and just 7% report no religious affiliation. In less than a decade, they — and a growing share of Baby Boomers (18% unaffiliated) — will disappear from survey samples.

Meanwhile, millennials are moving solidly into middle age, and 36% of them say they have no religion. Generation Z, all of whom will soon be adults, are even less religious: 43% are nones. That’s 25 points higher than the Boomers they’re replacing. So if the overall share of nones sits around 28% now, it will inevitably rise as generational turnover continues.

Third, Burge argues that even singular cultural events have not typically sustained any measurable rise in religious attendance in the United States over the last quarter century. Many remember the churches filling up after the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001 only to quickly return to normal. “Likewise, the Asbury University revival of February 2023 received wall-to-wall media coverage, but follow-up reporting showed no lasting change in local religiosity a year later.”

Thus, whereas talk of a full-scale “revival in America” seem to be overblown, there are nonetheless some encouraging signs amidst the overall institutional decline of the church in America:

  • 48% of Gen Zers and 44% of Millennials recently responded “Yes” to the idea: “I am open to Jesus, but do not consider myself a Christian today.” There seems to be a general openness to authentic ways of living for, and talking about, the way of Jesus amongst the younger generations.

  • Bible sales were up 11% in 2025 compared to 2024.

  • Reversing a decades-long trend, men (45%) are now significantly outpacing women (36%) in church attendance with married fathers taking the lead in going to church. Whether this is a net positive (where did all the women go?) over the long-haul remains to be seen, but the hope would be that as fathers take the lead in church attendance, the entire family might follow dad to church in the future.

The Rise of the Nones. Institutional church decline. Declining church attendance. None of these phrases sound overly hopeful for the future of the church in America. Yet these statistics themselves need to be set within the God-centered universe that the scriptures declare is our reality. Two scriptural phrases come to mind which help put these gloomy statistics in their proper place.   

“But God.” Ephesians 2 begins with terrible news: we were dead in our trespasses and sins (vs. 1). We were walking under the influence of the world and following the power of the devil (vs. 2), simply living for the passions of our flesh (vs. 3). No dystopian movie ever produced could give a bleaker, blacker, and more dismal  view of our situation than when Paul says that we “were by nature children of wrath” (vs. 3). That’s personally cataclysmic on an eternal scale! But then Paul reaches for the great phrase – BUT GOD.

But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ – by grace you have been saved. Ephesians 2:4-5.

Church trends are nothing compared to the great “But God” of his saving power.

The second scriptural phrase that seems apropos to remember in this cultural moment occurs in Matthew 19. The disciples are incredulous at Jesus. The bar of salvation seems too high to climb for the disciples. The disciples were “astonished” and began saying, “Who then can be saved?” (vs. 25). Jesus was telling his disciples, “Again, I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.” (vs. 24). Within the worldview of first-century Judaism, great wealth was often simplistically equated with great spiritual blessings from God. If the wealthy were only saved – with enormous difficulty – what hope was there for everyone else? That’s when Jesus reminded his disciples of the Lord’s great power to save: With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.” (vs. 26). Yes, there it is! With God all things are possible.

No matter how dark the culture or how toxic the politics or how declining the church, believers would be wise to remember: With God all things are possible. The possibility of revival is always over the next hill and horizon. God is always free to move with great saving power, bringing his beloved children into his church.

Jesus Christ is, after all, the Head of the Church. I trust that the Great Shepherd of the Sheep (Heb. 13:20) will always pastor us with grace and love whatever season the church is in: whether in retreat or advance, whether in revival or decline. God is still on the throne, whatever the trends say and whatever the culture decries.

With God all things are possible.

Soli Deo Gloria.

Jason Carter
What is an Evangelical?

In our era, “evangelical” has become a highly contested word, often associated with political movements in our nation and world. For years, I have reminded our congregation that “We are not a red church. We are not a blue church. We are a Jesus church” because we long to “keep the main thing, the main thing”. As a church family, we desire to be spiritually formed by the simple rhythms of grace – worship, prayer, scripture, community – all focused on Jesus.

Over the last 15 years, many evangelicals have given up on the term “evangelical”, viewing the word as severely compromised by the toxic political divisions in our country. Indeed, many people outside the church view the word as simply another moniker for a certain voting bloc or aligned with a specific demographic politically. They rarely realize the word has a long religious history.

Despite the recent attempt to colonize the word from the religious realm to the political sphere for its own ends, the word “evangelical” has a longer history than America’s recent political divisions. The word evangelical goes back 2,000 years to the New Testament Greek word euaggelion which is translated “gospel” or “good news”, appearing most prominently in the key thesis verses of Paul’s book of Romans:

For I am not ashamed of the gospel (euaggelion) for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, “The righteous shall live by faith.” – Romans 1:16-17

During the Reformation era, it was Martin Luther who sought to recover the gospel (euaggelion) and the righteousness of Christ that is ours through faith. The Protestant Reformation represented a vibrant spiritual recovery of the gospel of Jesus and what it meant to be an “evangelical Christian” – a believer who personally trusts in the gospel of Christ alone for salvation.

The 95 Theses of the Protestant Reformer Martin Luther called Christians back to the simple biblical gospel.

During the 20th century, an evangelical in America eventually came to be distinguished from fundamentalist Christians during the 1940s and 1950s. Whereas fundamentalists became increasingly separatist, anti-intellectual, and often legalistic vis-à-vis the modern cultural era, evangelicals sought an intelligent cultural engagement while keeping its grounding in the gospel of Jesus, in the inerrancy of scriptures, and in the substitutionary atonement. In the 1980s and 1990s, evangelical Christians left behind some of the “narrowness” and “legalism” of its fundamentalist forebearers through making major strides in scholarship by the writing of biblical commentaries, by setting up major seminaries for an emerging generation of leaders (i.e. Gordon Conwell Theological Seminary, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School), and by becoming missiological thought leaders through major conferences like the Lausanne Congress of World Evangelization in 1974 organized by evangelical leaders like Billy Graham and the British theologian and churchman John Stott.

American evangelist Billy Graham and British theologian John Stott were central leaders of the Lausanne Congress of World Evangelization, held in Lausanne, Switzerland in 1974.

Therefore, when I utilize the word “evangelical”, I have three horizons in mind, none of which have to do with American political ideology. The first horizon is biblical – I use the word “evangelical” to describe a person whose affections have been captured by “the gospel” of Jesus. Simply put, an evangelical strongly believes in the simple biblical gospel to radically transform lives. The second horizon is historical – an evangelical is a person who is buttressed by the robust theological tradition of the Protestant Reformation and its five solas: salvation is by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone to the glory of God alone as revealed by the scriptures alone. Though many 21st century evangelicals are increasingly abandoning this rich theological heritage in favor of a non-theological and rather vanilla and shallow emotionalism based on the categories of self-help and pop-psychology, my own understanding of evangelicalism is anchored by names like Luther and John Calvin, with a historical thread continuing through the English Puritans John Owen and Richard Baxter, and sprinkled with intrepid names like the American theologian Jonathan Edwards and British preachers Charles Haddon Spurgeon (aka “The Prince of Preachers” -19th century) and Martin Lloyd Jones of Westminster Chapel (20th century) culminating in the post-WW2 evangelistic crusades of Billy Graham. Historically, modern evangelicalism boasts a robust preaching tradition which combines intellectual rigor with an evangelistic heart. The third horizon is cultural – evangelicals have often been unafraid to tackle the societal challenges for faith arising in the modern and postmodern eras, whether the rise of science, the challenge of poverty, the problem of abortion, and the question of marriage. This unafraid cultural stance, epitomized by William Wilberforce who successfully campaigned the British Parliament to put an end to the Transatlantic Slave Trade, drives the modern evangelical impulse. A culturally winsome evangelical longs for the Christ-centered renewal of all things both at home (homelessness, prison ministry) and abroad through its global missionary efforts (unreached people groups, church planting, majority world theological institutions).

The British evangelical Christian, William Wilberforce, courageously and tirelessly campaigned against the Transatlantic Slave Trade, with the British Parliament passing the Slave Trade Act on March 25, 1807.

One of the most famous definitions of the modern evangelical movement is described in the so-called “Bebbington quadrilateral”, proposed by historian David Bebbeington in his 1989 book Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s, where he argues for four distinguishing characteristics of evangelicalism:

(1) Biblicism – a high view of the Bible as the Word of God and the ultimate authority in faith and life.

(2) Crucicentrism - a central focus on the atoning substitutionary work of Jesus Christ on the cross.

(3) Conversionism – the belief that men, women, and children all need to be spiritually transformed through being “born again” through a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.

(4) Activism – believers inherently express their gospel convictions through personal efforts in evangelism, missions, and societal reform.

What does this all mean? Evangelicalism, when it fully embraces its healthiest forms and expressions, can unabashedly drive forward the gospel of Jesus Christ in this broken world by being thoroughly committed to a high view of the scriptures through a laser-like focus on the cross of Christ in being unapologetic in calling all people to a personal relationship with Jesus while simultaneously working tirelessly and courageously for cultural renewal and the missionary enterprise in furthering the Kingdom of God.

On our best day as a church, we long to be biblically, historically, and culturally “evangelical” in the best sense of the word: committed to the gospel, committed to a high view of the transformative Word of God, committed to the simple message of the cross of Jesus that saves sinners, and committed to a winsome cultural engagement and to strategic missionary activity in all the world.

Jason Carter
A Biblical Theology of Philippians 2:12-13; Why Paul is not Synergistic in our Salvation by Grace through Faith

Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure. — Philippians 2:12-13

Over the years, many Christians have cited Philippians 2:12-13 -- “Work out your salvation with fear and trembling” – to make the argument that “Oh yes, here is where the apostle Paul diminishes divine sovereignty in favor of human responsibility in our salvation. You do your part, God does his part.”

Given all that we know about the apostle Paul’s theology, that interpretation would be a surprising departure from the rest of his theology. Is there human responsibility before God? Yes. We are all responsible for our sin!

  • “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands, no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.” (Rom 3:10b-12)

  • "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil". (2 Cor 5:10)

Therefore, here are 10 distinct reasons why “you do your part, God does his part” as you earn your own salvation is a misinterpretation of Pauline theology in general and Philippians 2:12-13 in particular.

Reason #1: Paul is not saying: “Work toward your salvation.” Or, “Work for your salvation.” Paul is encouraging you: Work out your salvation. That is a huge difference! Paul is talking about the process of sanctification – of growing in grace & holiness — not a matter of justification whereby you might earn your salvation by working for it.

Reason #2: Paul is not of two minds. Only a few verses earlier, Paul clearly and unequivocally writes: “This is a clear sign…of your salvation, and that from God.” (Phil. 1:28)

Reason #3: Paul is consistent throughout the epistle to the Philippians: In chapter 3, Paul denies any possibility of earning righteousness by working and obeying the law. Paul declares: “not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith.” (Phil 3:9)

Reason #4: Faith is a gift of God. Paul admonishes the Ephesian Christians: do not even make your faith a “work”. Paul calls faith a gift given to you by God: For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. (Eph 2:8-9).

Reason #5:  Paul is in agreement with the prophet Jonah: “Salvation belongs to the Lord!” (Jonah 2:9). I trust the witness of anyone who miraculously gets vomited out of a fish by a sovereign God!

Reason #6: Paul is in agreement the apostle John: John describes children of God “who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.”( John 1:13)

Reason #7: Paul is consistent throughout his theology. Paul writes his younger protégé Timothy about the God “who saved us and called us to a holy calling, not because of our works but because of his own purpose and grace, which he gave us in Christ Jesus before the ages began” (2 Timothy 1:9).

Reason #8: A dead person cannot “choose” anything, let alone God. A person in a casket no longer has any “choice” left in life. This is our condition apart from the saving act of God in regeneration. As Paul says, “You were dead in your trespasses and sins.” (Eph 2:1)

Reason #9: Obedience is the Pauline call to the Philippian believers directly after the Christ hymn (“my beloved, as you have always obeyed…,” Phil 2:12). Paul is saying; “Embrace Christ’s pattern of life based on his example in the Christ hymn (Phil 2:6-11). Don’t merely be spectators of Christ’s humble obedience, walk it out in your own life. Thus, “obedience” fits into the overall Pauline meaning of the passage, like he admonished the Philippians earlier: “Walk in a manner worthy of Christ (1:27). Paul is not suddenly talking about working “for” your salvation in Philippians 2:12-13. The imperative is “work out” your salvation by simple and humble obedience to Christ who Paul has set before them.

After admonishing the believers to walk in a manner worthy of Christ, it surely would be jarring if Paul suddenly decided to thrust them back on themselves in a way that would produce pride that they, in fact, are the ones working “for” their salvation.

Reason #10: God gets all the glory in your salvation. Not you. Paul admits no boasting before God in your salvation. DeYoung writes: “If we contribute or cooperate in any way in our regeneration, then we can be proud of contributing some small part to our salvation, of which Paul says, ‘But far be it from be to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ.’” (Gal. 6:14)

So here is how not to interpret Phil 2:12-13:  

“Oh, the apostle of the free grace of God suddenly is retracting his gospel that God justifies by grace through faith and now is talking about your contribution in working for your salvation. Paul even adds “with fear and trembling” because he wants to make salvation a point of ‘nervous insecurity’ in your life. Indeed, you now ride on the spiritual roller coaster of emotions because your Christian life (after joyously coming to Christ) is ALL UP TO YOU: self-satisfaction with yourself when “you get it right” and self-condemnation when you “get it wrong”. I guess this is just the Christian life.”(1)

Better to “Fall on Grace” and “Fall on Humility” because Philippians 2:13 literally reads: “For God is the working one.” God promises to work powerfully in your life by faith, by the Holy Spirit, by the Word of God, and by the fellowship of believers. For God is the working one! This is such good news!

God does not stand back and say: “Hey pal, The Cross! The Resurrection! I’ve done my part. What more do you want? Now it’s up to you!” That is not God’s heart, and that is not the biblical vision of the Christian life. God is always the working one in our initial salvation and throughout our lives in our sanctification.

*****

“The work of God in regeneration is monergistic (by the one working) not synergistic (by a work of cooperation). That is to say, regeneration is God’s work and his alone. Being dead in our sins and trespasses, we are passive, helpless, acted upon in the new birth, rather than working jointly with God. The Reformed confessions all reject the synergism of the [Roman Catholic] Council of Trent whereby the will is said to be “excited and assisted” by divine grace…We are not mostly dead; we are all the way dead.

Given the monergistic nature of the new birth, we must also conclude that regeneration precedes faith. We don’t believe unto new life; we are given new life that we may believe….In the miracle of regeneration, we bring nothing and do nothing. That’s why Paul likens regeneration to a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17) and to a resurrection (Col. 2:12).”

– Kevin DeYoung, Daily Doctrine

(1) Paraphrase by Jason Carter & Dennis Johnson in Philippians: Reformed Expository Commentary.

Jason Carter
Atheistic Arguments Put to the Fire

Apologetics is having a cultural moment.

Apologetics is a reasoned defense of the Christian faith, derived from the Greek word apologia, meaning a “formal defense or reply”. Apologists provide rational and evidence-based objections to various objections against Christianity — such as the existence of God, the reliability of the Bible, the problem of evil, and the resurrection of Jesus.

Twenty-first century apologists have found a comfortable niche on media platforms like Youtube and are even making the rounds of uber-popular secular podcasts. Conversations about the origins of the universe, the reliability of the Bible, and the ultimate meaning of life seem to be back in the consciousness of mainstream western culture.

#1: Wes Huff

Wes Huff

Wes Huff (left) has appeared on the #1 Podcast in the World (The Joe Rogan Experience).

Wes Huff is a Canadian biblical scholar and vice-president of Apologetics Canada and has been featured on The Joe Rogan Experience (The #1 Podcast in the world) and featured on The Diary of a CEO.

Wes Huff has appeared on the popular “Diary of a CEO” podcast with Steven Bartlett. You can listen here.

On the Wes Huff website, he has a series of excellent videos entitled “Can I Trust the Bible”?

  • Episode #1: The Right Books

  • Episode #2: The Right Text

  • Plus Q & A Videos about the Bible

Wes Huff appears with John Lovell in a program entitled “Top 7 Atheist Arguments Debunked”. For the last 30 minutes, Wes Huff provides succinct answers to some of the biggest objections to Christianity in a very helpful way (best to begin at the 31 minute mark).

#2: William Lane Craig @ Reasonable Faith

The Fine Tuning of the Universe by William Lane Craig’s “Reasonable Faith” ministry is a succinct, pithy, and convincing argument for theism. The Fine Tuning argument is often conceded by atheist-scientists as one of the more difficult theistic arguments to counter.

William Lane Craig is widely regarded as as one of the premier philosopher-apologists of our era.

#3 Gavin Ortlund @ Truth Unites

Gavin Ortlund is a Christian apologist from a Reformed Baptist background with a Ph.D. from Fuller Theological Seminary. Ortlund runs a very popular Youtube channel called Truth Unites. He is engaging, intellectually honest, and comes from a Reformed-Evangelical perspective. Here are some videos and podcasts that I’ve watched or listened to and some that I want to engage with in the future.

Gavin Ortlund

Gavin Ortlund has a podcast and Youtube channel dedicated to apologetics as well as engaging with biblical, theological, and church history topics.

Gavin Ortlund’s Why God Makes Sense in a World that Doesn’t was one of the best books that I read in 2025.

In “Why God Makes Sense”, Ortlund sets up his apologetic shop at the intersection of beauty and truth:

  • “Beauty is a powerful tool for cutting through disenchantment and apathy because it has a kind of persuasive power that reaches down to the heart.” (pp. 7)

Ortlund’s book taps into the longing for beauty inside every human heart. Ortlund describes the truth of Christianity so richly and beautifully that people, even outside the faith, might say: “I want this to be true. I ache for this to be true, because this Christian vision of a life with God is so beautiful and compelling.” This is an apologetic that provides a rich invitation to “taste and see that the Lord is good” (Psalm 34:8).

Jason Carter